0003976: Upsteam name needs to be changed, as it is not the proper reporting directive

(0010265)
kbsingh@karan.org (administrator)
2009-11-03 22:55

well, CentOS-5 does not ship with a 2.6.9 kernel, also needs more info as to where this paste came from

(0010266)
herrold (administrator)
2009-11-03 23:11

true enough as to this being an older release -- I chose the wrong box looks like
the reporter appeared in the #centos IRC channel today:

13:46 fets> ah - I found a place in Centos where it still refers to
             RHEL: http://pastebin.org/50576 [^] ...
13:46 orc_orc> fets: there are several - copyright notices are not
                trademarks
13:47 orc_orc> that, however is not one of them
13:47 fets> is it something that should be changed?
13:47 samushka> is there any package modification apart from removing
                 redhat trademarks?
13:48 orc_orc> Alagar: sure - the approach on handing updates out is
                much different
13:49 orc_orc> fets: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3976 [^]
13:50 orc_orc> see how easy that was

(0010267)
herrold (administrator)
2009-11-03 23:11

scrape of the IRC session added from the initial report

(0010268)
kbsingh@karan.org (administrator)
2009-11-03 23:21

could yu file this against C4 please, tru has offered to consider it for the next kernel update - we missed this one by a few hours!

(0010270)
herrold (administrator)
2009-11-04 02:19

This moved through the 'View Advanced' menu

(0010271)
herrold (administrator)
2009-11-04 02:19

moved into C4 per KB's request

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2009-11-03 18:49	herrold	New Issue
2009-11-03 18:49	herrold	Assigned To	=> kbsingh@karan.org
2009-11-03 22:55	kbsingh@karan.org	Note Added: 0010265
2009-11-03 22:55	kbsingh@karan.org	Status	new => closed
2009-11-03 22:55	kbsingh@karan.org	Resolution	open => not fixable
2009-11-03 23:11	herrold	Note Added: 0010266
2009-11-03 23:11	herrold	Note Added: 0010267
2009-11-03 23:11	herrold	Status	closed => feedback
2009-11-03 23:11	herrold	Resolution	not fixable => reopened
2009-11-03 23:15	kbsingh@karan.org	Assigned To	kbsingh@karan.org => tru
2009-11-03 23:21	kbsingh@karan.org	Note Added: 0010268
2009-11-04 02:18	herrold	Project	CentOS-5 => CentOS-4
2009-11-04 02:19	herrold	Note Added: 0010270
2009-11-04 02:19	herrold	Note Added: 0010271
2009-11-04 02:19	herrold	Status	feedback => new

Notes
(0010265) kbsingh@karan.org (administrator) 2009-11-03 22:55	well, CentOS-5 does not ship with a 2.6.9 kernel, also needs more info as to where this paste came from

(0010266) herrold (administrator) 2009-11-03 23:11	true enough as to this being an older release -- I chose the wrong box looks like the reporter appeared in the #centos IRC channel today: 13:46 fets> ah - I found a place in Centos where it still refers to RHEL: http://pastebin.org/50576 [^] ... 13:46 orc_orc> fets: there are several - copyright notices are not trademarks 13:47 orc_orc> that, however is not one of them 13:47 fets> is it something that should be changed? 13:47 samushka> is there any package modification apart from removing redhat trademarks? 13:48 orc_orc> Alagar: sure - the approach on handing updates out is much different 13:49 orc_orc> fets: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3976 [^] 13:50 orc_orc> see how easy that was

(0010267) herrold (administrator) 2009-11-03 23:11	scrape of the IRC session added from the initial report

(0010268) kbsingh@karan.org (administrator) 2009-11-03 23:21	could yu file this against C4 please, tru has offered to consider it for the next kernel update - we missed this one by a few hours!

(0010270) herrold (administrator) 2009-11-04 02:19	This moved through the 'View Advanced' menu

(0010271) herrold (administrator) 2009-11-04 02:19	moved into C4 per KB's request

Relationships