View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0011972CentOS CI[All Projects] generalpublic2020-01-29 16:39
PrioritynormalSeveritymajorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Summary0011972: Need to update some RDO Trunk directories when syncing to buildlogs mirrors
DescriptionAfter opening the release cycle for Ocata, we need to change the source for synchronization of the following directories:

centos-ocata/data/repos/current-passed-ci -> rdo-trunk-master-tested
centos-ocata/data/repos/current-tripleo -> rdo-trunk-master-tripleo
centos-ocata/data/repos/consistent -> rdo-trunk-master

Those directories were previously pointing to the same location under the centos-newton directory. Since the content being generated is new, would it be possible to remove the old content and refresh?

Additionally, we need to create the following new repository:

centos-newton/data/repos/current-passed-ci -> rdo-trunk-newton-tested

TagsNo tags attached.




2016-10-06 14:53

reporter   ~0027666

> centos-ocata/data/repos/consistent -> rdo-trunk-master

I think we should drop this one and remove it on buildlogs/CDN
it just too much churn.


2016-10-06 15:05

reporter   ~0027667

I've checked it, and we have no redirects to rdo-trunk-master from other repos, so we should be able to drop it. With this, the requirement would be:

- Change:
centos-ocata/data/repos/current-passed-ci -> rdo-trunk-master-tested
centos-ocata/data/repos/current-tripleo -> rdo-trunk-master-tripleo

- New:
centos-newton/data/repos/current-passed-ci -> rdo-trunk-newton-tested

- Drop:
-> rdo-trunk-master


2016-10-06 15:57

reporter   ~0027668

While at it let's review all rdo-* folders under

rdo-trunk-kilo/ DROP (it is EOL)
rdo-trunk-liberty-tested/ KEEP (but will be EOL next month)
rdo-trunk-liberty/ DROP
rdo-trunk-master-tested/ CHANGE as per above
rdo-trunk-master-tripleo/ CHANGE as per above
rdo-trunk-master/ DROP
rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/ KEEP
rdo-trunk-mitaka/ DROP
rdo-trunk-newton-tested/ NEW as per above

2016-10-07 09:49

administrator   ~0027673

$cmd/centos-newton/data/repos/consistent/* rdo-trunk-master/
    $cmd/centos-newton/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-master-tested/
    $cmd/centos-newton/data/repos/current-tripleo/* rdo-trunk-master-tripleo/
    $cmd/centos-mitaka/data/repos/consistent/* rdo-trunk-mitaka/
    $cmd/centos-mitaka/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
    $cmd/centos-liberty/data/repos/consistent/* rdo-trunk-liberty/
    $cmd/centos-liberty/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-liberty-tested/

are the present mappings as a FYI


2016-10-07 09:51

reporter   ~0027674

Based on that, our proposal for the new mapping is:

    $cmd/centos-newton/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-newton-tested/
    $cmd/centos-mitaka/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
    $cmd/centos-liberty/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-liberty-tested/
    $cmd/centos-ocata/data/repos/current-passed-ci/* rdo-trunk-master-tested/
    $cmd/centos-ocata/data/repos/current-tripleo/* rdo-trunk-master-tripleo/

And anything rdo-trunk-* not on that list would need to be removed, when possible.

2016-10-07 10:03

administrator   ~0027675

@jpena - are we good to action this ? I am happy to remove all other mappings entirely and just use the 5 you mentioned.


2016-10-07 10:06

reporter   ~0027676

Yes please. Let's go ahead and use the 5 proposed mappings.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2016-10-06 08:38 jpena New Issue
2016-10-06 14:53 apevec Note Added: 0027666
2016-10-06 15:05 jpena Note Added: 0027667
2016-10-06 15:17 Status new => acknowledged
2016-10-06 15:57 apevec Note Added: 0027668
2016-10-07 09:49 Note Added: 0027673
2016-10-07 09:51 jpena Note Added: 0027674
2016-10-07 10:03 Note Added: 0027675
2016-10-07 10:06 jpena Note Added: 0027676
2016-10-07 10:37 Status acknowledged => resolved
2016-10-07 10:37 Resolution open => fixed
2020-01-29 16:39 arrfab Project Buildsys => CentOS CI
2020-01-29 16:39 arrfab Category Ecosystem Testing => general