View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0012500 | CentOS-7 | kernel | public | 2016-12-26 06:34 | 2018-08-20 19:59 |
Reporter | pajamian | ||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||
Platform | OS | CentOS | OS Version | 7 | |
Product Version | 7.3.1611 | ||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
Summary | 0012500: kernel-debuginfo 4.4 in base-debuginfo? | ||||
Description | Why is there a kernel that CentOS does not release in the base-debuginfo repo? kernel-debuginfo.x86_64 4.4.26-201.el7.centos base-debuginfo | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
abrt_hash | |||||
URL | |||||
Some new info: Apparently the kernel in question is in altarch experimental: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/Packages/kernel-4.4.26-201.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm So this brings up two issues: * Why are we are putting an x86_64 *anything* in altarch? * Putting the -debuginfo packages for these kernels into base-debuginfo causes issues for anyone who is running a stock kernel and needs the debuginfo package for it. We should be putting the debuginfo for these kernels somewhere else entirely. |
|
I'm updating the kernel and yum distro-sync wants to install kernel-debuginfo 4.9.75-204.el7.centos, which doesn't match the kernel I'm about to install as it's 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7 This inconsistency is a bit painful, as, once updated, I have to remove the mismatched kernel debuginfo, in order to use debuginfo-install to retrieve the debuginfo matching the installed kernel. |
|
$ repoquery kernel-debuginfo kernel-debuginfo-0:4.9.75-204.el7.centos.x86_64 $ repoquery --location kernel-debuginfo http://debuginfo.centos.org/7/x86_64/kernel-debuginfo-4.9.75-204.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm |
|
People complained that those lived in the same place as normal kernels . .NOW they live here: http://debuginfo.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/ |
|
as are as why altarch for x86_64 .. because I am already doing it for i386 in that path and we have enough repos already. The same .repo file works as is for both i386 and x86_64 (and the other arches too), and it is not officially supported for x86_64 anyway. |
|
Thanks a lot ! | |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2016-12-26 06:34 | pajamian | New Issue | |
2016-12-28 19:02 | toracat | Status | new => acknowledged |
2017-01-03 01:10 | pajamian | Note Added: 0028261 | |
2018-08-20 15:36 | ydroneaud@opteya.org | Note Added: 0032551 | |
2018-08-20 15:42 | ydroneaud@opteya.org | Note Added: 0032552 | |
2018-08-20 17:45 | JohnnyHughes | Note Added: 0032555 | |
2018-08-20 17:51 | JohnnyHughes | Note Added: 0032556 | |
2018-08-20 17:51 | JohnnyHughes | Note Edited: 0032556 | View Revisions |
2018-08-20 19:59 | ydroneaud@opteya.org | Note Added: 0032557 |