View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0017202 | CentOS-8 | guile | public | 2020-03-30 17:58 | 2020-03-30 17:58 |
| Reporter | jcbollinger | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 8.1.1911 | ||||
| Summary | 0017202: guile1.8-snarf emits broken output | ||||
| Description | guile1.8-snarf, the version of guile-snarf packaged with the Guile1.8 compatibility devtools (compat-guile18-devel), consistently produces broken output. For example, given an input C source file with this content: #include <libguile.h> SCM stest_object_new (SCM, SCM); SCM_PROC (s_object_new, "test-object-new", 1, 0, 1, stest_object_new); it emits this faulty output: /* cpp arguments: test.c */ scm_c_define_gsubr ( When there are multiple declarations to snarf, a broken declaration is emitted for each one. The correct output would be something substantially equivalent to this: /* cpp arguments: test.c */ scm_c_define_gsubr ( s_object_new , 1, 0, 1, (SCM (*)()) stest_object_new) ; , which is what guile-snarf v1.8.7 of CentOS 6 emits. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | $ cat >test.c <<'EOF' #include <libguile.h> SCM stest_object_new (SCM, SCM); SCM_PROC (s_object_new, "test-object-new", 1, 0, 1, stest_object_new); EOF $ guile1.8-snarf test.c | ||||
| Additional Information | The guile-snarf program from the main guile-devel package appears to produce acceptable output for the example case, so it may be usable as a workaround. It is difficult to be certain that that v2.0 implementation will produce output correct for v1.8 under all circumstances, however. | ||||
| Tags | bug | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-30 17:58 | jcbollinger | New Issue | |
| 2020-03-30 17:58 | jcbollinger | Tag Attached: bug |
