| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003136 | CentOS-4 | kernel-centosplus | public | 2008-09-16 16:18 | 2013-03-23 21:46 | ||||
| Reporter | opoplawski | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | crash | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | suspended | ||||||
| Product Version | 4.6 | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
| Summary | 0003136: do_IRQ stack overflow 496 | ||||||||
| Description | With 2.6.9-67.0.22.plus.c4smp our disk server recently crashed with: do_IRQ stack overflow 496 about the only useful information on the console. I'm moving to 2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4smp now, but wondering if the centos plus kernel should move away from 4k stacks. I'm using a jfs filesystem and I've heard rumours that some other filesystems need more stack. | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
| Notes |
|
|
opoplawski (reporter) 2009-06-30 16:46 |
I had a similar crash with 2.6.9-78.0.22.plus.c4smp and using xfs (which I have also heard has stack issues). |
|
opoplawski (reporter) 2009-06-30 20:54 |
According to Eric Sandeen, this should be fixed in 2.6.9-78.8.EL and beyond. Will try with 2.6.9-89.0.3.EL. |
|
tigalch (manager) 2013-03-23 21:46 |
CentOS4 is EOL. |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09-16 16:18 | opoplawski | New Issue | |
| 2009-06-30 16:46 | opoplawski | Note Added: 0009538 | |
| 2009-06-30 16:46 | opoplawski | File Added: alexandria.crash | |
| 2009-06-30 20:54 | opoplawski | Note Added: 0009539 | |
| 2013-03-23 21:46 | tigalch | Note Added: 0016975 | |
| 2013-03-23 21:46 | tigalch | Status | new => closed |
| 2013-03-23 21:46 | tigalch | Resolution | open => suspended |
| Issue History |
